You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi,
I use my own dataset.
A total of eight categories,
832 training datasets (104 per category) and 360 validation datasets (45 per category).
The result of the pretext:
The top result of the kNN evaluation is 67.5
Accuracy of top-10 nearest neighbors on train set is 67.9
Accuracy of top-5 nearest neighbors on val set is 76.83
The result of SCAN ACC=0.631, and The result of Self-label ACC=0.3
I used to change the Parameter of the Pretext: Augmentations, batch size, features_dim, temperaturee
The results of the Pretext are about the same.
And change the Parameter of the SCAN: batch size, entropy_weight, num_neighbors
I haven't seen a significant improvement.
What should I do to make the result better?
Thanks
Kelly
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
kkellyk
changed the title
The pretext result is not ideal
The scan result is not ideal
Oct 31, 2022
Hi,
I use my own dataset.
A total of eight categories,
832 training datasets (104 per category) and 360 validation datasets (45 per category).
The result of the pretext:
The result of SCAN ACC=0.631, and The result of Self-label ACC=0.3
I used to change the Parameter of the Pretext:
Augmentations, batch size, features_dim, temperaturee
The results of the Pretext are about the same.
And change the Parameter of the SCAN:
batch size, entropy_weight, num_neighbors
I haven't seen a significant improvement.
What should I do to make the result better?
Thanks
Kelly
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: