Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Which of RV64GBCV, RV64GCBV, and RV64GCVB is legal? #1628

Open
songdongsheng opened this issue Sep 5, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Which of RV64GBCV, RV64GCBV, and RV64GCVB is legal? #1628

songdongsheng opened this issue Sep 5, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@songdongsheng
Copy link

Hi, I've seen vendors say that RV64GBCV, RV64GCBV, and RV64GCVB are all used when implementing the B and V extensions in the specification. Which of RV64GBCV, RV64GCBV, and RV64GCVB is legal according to the RISC-V specification?

@kito-cheng
Copy link
Member

According the table in the spec[1], rv64gcbv is the (more?) canonical one.

[1] https://github.com/riscv/riscv-isa-manual/blob/main/src/naming.adoc#subset-naming-convention

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants